<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Click Fraud Up 15% in 2007 Says Click&#160;Forensics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/click-fraud-jumped-15-in-2007-says-click-forensics/6311/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/click-fraud-jumped-15-in-2007-says-click-forensics/6311/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:43:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO Design Solutions</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/click-fraud-jumped-15-in-2007-says-click-forensics/6311/comment-page-1/#comment-923453</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO Design Solutions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 22:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/click-fraud-jumped-15-in-2007-says-click-forensics/6311/#comment-923453</guid>
		<description>Loren:

This is exactly why we refuse to use it. It&#039;s all about organic. Not to sound one sided as an SEO, it&#039; just makes more sense to develop content that is closer to home (as far as relevance) and you just don&#039;t see a site about automobiles ranking for fashion design. 

Organic SEO by it&#039;s very fabric forces relevance from the core of the content. Higher click through traffic and higher relevance equal higher natural conversion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Loren:</p>
<p>This is exactly why we refuse to use it. It&#8217;s all about organic. Not to sound one sided as an SEO, it&#8217; just makes more sense to develop content that is closer to home (as far as relevance) and you just don&#8217;t see a site about automobiles ranking for fashion design. </p>
<p>Organic SEO by it&#8217;s very fabric forces relevance from the core of the content. Higher click through traffic and higher relevance equal higher natural conversion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Favorite Browser</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/click-fraud-jumped-15-in-2007-says-click-forensics/6311/comment-page-1/#comment-914961</link>
		<dc:creator>Favorite Browser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 19:34:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/click-fraud-jumped-15-in-2007-says-click-forensics/6311/#comment-914961</guid>
		<description>I bet that we will see France on your next report (maybe after 1 year?). As for me, that&#039;s from where I got most of it at this moment. They are not using anything fancy yet, just playing with IP&#039;s. Easy to hunt. Maybe in 2010 we will see Italy as well, it&#039;s growing at this moment. Not yet noticable, but they are doing something more fancy. Russians got really good tools for click fraud, hard to hunt if you are not very well experienced. Chinese and USA &quot;webmasters&quot; loves to use hidden iframe codes, so once user visits site, &quot;he/she clicks&quot; on add without knowing that.

Funny that click fraud is isn&#039;t well controlled and sad that advertisers, especially new ones are losing their hard earned money...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bet that we will see France on your next report (maybe after 1 year?). As for me, that&#8217;s from where I got most of it at this moment. They are not using anything fancy yet, just playing with IP&#8217;s. Easy to hunt. Maybe in 2010 we will see Italy as well, it&#8217;s growing at this moment. Not yet noticable, but they are doing something more fancy. Russians got really good tools for click fraud, hard to hunt if you are not very well experienced. Chinese and USA &#8220;webmasters&#8221; loves to use hidden iframe codes, so once user visits site, &#8220;he/she clicks&#8221; on add without knowing that.</p>
<p>Funny that click fraud is isn&#8217;t well controlled and sad that advertisers, especially new ones are losing their hard earned money&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Search◆ Engines Web</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/click-fraud-jumped-15-in-2007-says-click-forensics/6311/comment-page-1/#comment-914805</link>
		<dc:creator>Search◆ Engines Web</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 19:03:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/click-fraud-jumped-15-in-2007-says-click-forensics/6311/#comment-914805</guid>
		<description>Google did indicate that it was going to allow a Pay Per Impression alternative to the PPCs.

This may be the only way to stem the tide.  It is just going to get worse.

PayPerImpression for those who just do not want to take a chance.

Yahoo now has up to FIVE sponsor links before the organics - this certainly does not help

&lt;b&gt; http://blogoscoped.com/forum/114161.html &lt;/b&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google did indicate that it was going to allow a Pay Per Impression alternative to the PPCs.</p>
<p>This may be the only way to stem the tide.  It is just going to get worse.</p>
<p>PayPerImpression for those who just do not want to take a chance.</p>
<p>Yahoo now has up to FIVE sponsor links before the organics &#8211; this certainly does not help</p>
<p><b> <a href="http://blogoscoped.com/forum/114161.html" rel="nofollow">http://blogoscoped.com/forum/114161.html</a> </b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

