<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Where Can the Canonical Tag Be Actually&#160;Used?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/canonical-tag/9631/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/canonical-tag/9631/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 03:49:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Perkins</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/canonical-tag/9631/comment-page-1/#comment-1097885</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Perkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 10:26:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=9631#comment-1097885</guid>
		<description>There are some scenarios where only the rel=canonical tag will work.

An example would be a page that had the Google Analytics utm_ parameters  in the URL.  If you redirect to a URL without those parameters, you&#039;ll break Analytics.  If you don&#039;t redirect, you&#039;ll run into canonical issues.

More detail is available at the link in my sig.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are some scenarios where only the rel=canonical tag will work.</p>
<p>An example would be a page that had the Google Analytics utm_ parameters  in the URL.  If you redirect to a URL without those parameters, you&#8217;ll break Analytics.  If you don&#8217;t redirect, you&#8217;ll run into canonical issues.</p>
<p>More detail is available at the link in my sig.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Turner</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/canonical-tag/9631/comment-page-1/#comment-1097771</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Turner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 16:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=9631#comment-1097771</guid>
		<description>I think there are many situations where the tag can be used. Fore example, if you have a page that displays a set of results - and filters to allow users to reorder those results (which affect the URL of the page) - you could use the tag.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think there are many situations where the tag can be used. Fore example, if you have a page that displays a set of results &#8211; and filters to allow users to reorder those results (which affect the URL of the page) &#8211; you could use the tag.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin March</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/canonical-tag/9631/comment-page-1/#comment-1097735</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin March</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 11:16:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=9631#comment-1097735</guid>
		<description>Wait and see seems to be the correct modus operandi excepting in a few instances when 301 redirects are not appropriate (PPC landing pages that have unexpectedly gained inbound links for example)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait and see seems to be the correct modus operandi excepting in a few instances when 301 redirects are not appropriate (PPC landing pages that have unexpectedly gained inbound links for example)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/canonical-tag/9631/comment-page-1/#comment-1097680</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 19:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=9631#comment-1097680</guid>
		<description>I recently switched to WP2.7, and google started indexing comment urls, comment pages - and horror, stopped indexing altogether. After a lot of attempts, I tried a canonical plugin - and the next post onwards, indexing problems vanished.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently switched to WP2.7, and google started indexing comment urls, comment pages &#8211; and horror, stopped indexing altogether. After a lot of attempts, I tried a canonical plugin &#8211; and the next post onwards, indexing problems vanished.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/canonical-tag/9631/comment-page-1/#comment-1097679</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 18:59:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=9631#comment-1097679</guid>
		<description>it should be used with care

i wrote a post about using it in blogs 

everyone seems to be using it the WRONG WAY

http://centuryhouse.net/canonicalization-element/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it should be used with care</p>
<p>i wrote a post about using it in blogs </p>
<p>everyone seems to be using it the WRONG WAY</p>
<p><a href="http://centuryhouse.net/canonicalization-element/" rel="nofollow">http://centuryhouse.net/canonicalization-element/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lohith</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/canonical-tag/9631/comment-page-1/#comment-1097678</link>
		<dc:creator>lohith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 18:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=9631#comment-1097678</guid>
		<description>I will wait and watch the performance of this tag.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will wait and watch the performance of this tag.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jai</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/canonical-tag/9631/comment-page-1/#comment-1097671</link>
		<dc:creator>Jai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 16:48:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=9631#comment-1097671</guid>
		<description>I read here that canonical tags created by SEO plugins need to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/2009/04/seo-wordpress-plugin-drops-google-pagerank/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;used with care&lt;/a&gt; or they can mess your pagerann.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read here that canonical tags created by SEO plugins need to <a href="http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/2009/04/seo-wordpress-plugin-drops-google-pagerank/" rel="nofollow">used with care</a> or they can mess your pagerann.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

