<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Breaking Google&#8217;s Great Firewall of&#160;China</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/breaking-googles-great-firewall-of-china/2853/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/breaking-googles-great-firewall-of-china/2853/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:48:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Net</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/breaking-googles-great-firewall-of-china/2853/comment-page-1/#comment-64166</link>
		<dc:creator>Net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2006 16:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=2853#comment-64166</guid>
		<description>Is some Google in China better than no Google at all.  Waht would be the alternative? Having Google banned from China/please consider the possibilities</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is some Google in China better than no Google at all.  Waht would be the alternative? Having Google banned from China/please consider the possibilities</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ip</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/breaking-googles-great-firewall-of-china/2853/comment-page-1/#comment-61745</link>
		<dc:creator>ip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2006 14:02:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=2853#comment-61745</guid>
		<description>i would like to say that firewall in china is not good .it will lost many business for the citizens of china .and most of the chinese citizens will be always kept in the box of dark and nothing knowledge to know.It would make chinese people a step behind those who know everything.For the future of China ..i think the censorship should be cancelled and make fair for every citizens.In that way ...both the government and the citizens will get benefit.If people know many things it will help them to do business.Then the country income will increase.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i would like to say that firewall in china is not good .it will lost many business for the citizens of china .and most of the chinese citizens will be always kept in the box of dark and nothing knowledge to know.It would make chinese people a step behind those who know everything.For the future of China ..i think the censorship should be cancelled and make fair for every citizens.In that way &#8230;both the government and the citizens will get benefit.If people know many things it will help them to do business.Then the country income will increase.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mysterius</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/breaking-googles-great-firewall-of-china/2853/comment-page-1/#comment-60942</link>
		<dc:creator>Mysterius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 05:39:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=2853#comment-60942</guid>
		<description>You know, besides the general so-called &quot;motto&quot; of &quot;Don&#039;t be evil,&quot; the two cases (US and China) aren&#039;t really about the same thing. In the US, Google is legally protesting against the goverment trying to access information related to citizens. In China, Google is forced into limiting access to information concerning the government through a specific portal (designed to be communist-friendly) from citizens. In that perspective, the cases are opposites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, besides the general so-called &#8220;motto&#8221; of &#8220;Don&#8217;t be evil,&#8221; the two cases (US and China) aren&#8217;t really about the same thing. In the US, Google is legally protesting against the goverment trying to access information related to citizens. In China, Google is forced into limiting access to information concerning the government through a specific portal (designed to be communist-friendly) from citizens. In that perspective, the cases are opposites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike O'Brien</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/breaking-googles-great-firewall-of-china/2853/comment-page-1/#comment-60932</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike O'Brien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 15:05:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=2853#comment-60932</guid>
		<description>Odd how Google is so big on stopping control of the Google information by denying information to the US Government about searching patterns (where NO private info is released or requested by the government) but caves in to Chinese control of their information in order to make a buck. Somehow, I see a discontinuity here. And also odd how they re-wrote their statement of censorship to be more in line with their actions. Did anyone read Orwell&#039;s 1984 where documents were re-written to make them more in line with official actions?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Odd how Google is so big on stopping control of the Google information by denying information to the US Government about searching patterns (where NO private info is released or requested by the government) but caves in to Chinese control of their information in order to make a buck. Somehow, I see a discontinuity here. And also odd how they re-wrote their statement of censorship to be more in line with their actions. Did anyone read Orwell&#8217;s 1984 where documents were re-written to make them more in line with official actions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mcconnell</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/breaking-googles-great-firewall-of-china/2853/comment-page-1/#comment-60926</link>
		<dc:creator>mcconnell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 12:44:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=2853#comment-60926</guid>
		<description>Hey, parachuting laptops into communist and tyranical countries sounds like a good idea. Now, maybe if China improves their trade deficit with the U.S., perhaps we wouldn&#039;t be shouting as much? 

Thanks Loren for letting me &quot;guest blog&quot; on your website.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, parachuting laptops into communist and tyranical countries sounds like a good idea. Now, maybe if China improves their trade deficit with the U.S., perhaps we wouldn&#8217;t be shouting as much? </p>
<p>Thanks Loren for letting me &#8220;guest blog&#8221; on your website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

