<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BlackHat SEO: Is it really pure&#160;evil?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/blackhat-seo-is-it-really-pure-evil/7111/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/blackhat-seo-is-it-really-pure-evil/7111/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:43:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chicago SEO</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/blackhat-seo-is-it-really-pure-evil/7111/comment-page-1/#comment-1271757</link>
		<dc:creator>Chicago SEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 04:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/blackhat-seo-is-it-really-pure-evil/7111/#comment-1271757</guid>
		<description>There is nothing wrong with black hat SEO!  Everyone I know uses Black hat SEO.  I&#039;ve seen guys working out of their garage rank higher than large companies who think they have everything figured out with a team of programmers thinking that doorway pages and such are going to help them out.  These businesses need to dump their programmers who think everything can be solved through programming.  You know what I&#039;m talking about? 312-725-4437, here&#039;s the number you&#039;re searching for loser!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is nothing wrong with black hat SEO!  Everyone I know uses Black hat SEO.  I&#39;ve seen guys working out of their garage rank higher than large companies who think they have everything figured out with a team of programmers thinking that doorway pages and such are going to help them out.  These businesses need to dump their programmers who think everything can be solved through programming.  You know what I&#39;m talking about? 312-725-4437, here&#39;s the number you&#39;re searching for loser!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chicago SEO</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/blackhat-seo-is-it-really-pure-evil/7111/comment-page-1/#comment-1231090</link>
		<dc:creator>Chicago SEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 23:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/blackhat-seo-is-it-really-pure-evil/7111/#comment-1231090</guid>
		<description>There is nothing wrong with black hat SEO!  Everyone I know uses Black hat SEO.  I&#039;ve seen guys working out of their garage rank higher than large companies who think they have everything figured out with a team of programmers thinking that doorway pages and such are going to help them out.  These businesses need to dump their programmers who think everything can be solved through programming.  You know what I&#039;m talking about? 312-725-4437, here&#039;s the number you&#039;re searching for loser!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is nothing wrong with black hat SEO!  Everyone I know uses Black hat SEO.  I&#39;ve seen guys working out of their garage rank higher than large companies who think they have everything figured out with a team of programmers thinking that doorway pages and such are going to help them out.  These businesses need to dump their programmers who think everything can be solved through programming.  You know what I&#39;m talking about? 312-725-4437, here&#39;s the number you&#39;re searching for loser!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/blackhat-seo-is-it-really-pure-evil/7111/comment-page-1/#comment-1090991</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 13:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/blackhat-seo-is-it-really-pure-evil/7111/#comment-1090991</guid>
		<description>Interesting article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brisbane Marketing Consultant</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/blackhat-seo-is-it-really-pure-evil/7111/comment-page-1/#comment-1084655</link>
		<dc:creator>Brisbane Marketing Consultant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 08:52:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/blackhat-seo-is-it-really-pure-evil/7111/#comment-1084655</guid>
		<description>Maybe the rise of social bookmarking is a result of black hat SEO?  Real people have very good BS filters and can usually smell a rat. 

Perhaps Google and the others should put a bit more weight on what humans vote for?  

I&#039;ve noticed over the last few months Google ranking social media pages very high considering the age of the page and the number of incoming links.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe the rise of social bookmarking is a result of black hat SEO?  Real people have very good BS filters and can usually smell a rat. </p>
<p>Perhaps Google and the others should put a bit more weight on what humans vote for?  </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve noticed over the last few months Google ranking social media pages very high considering the age of the page and the number of incoming links.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO Training</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/blackhat-seo-is-it-really-pure-evil/7111/comment-page-1/#comment-1084623</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO Training</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 12:29:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/blackhat-seo-is-it-really-pure-evil/7111/#comment-1084623</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s no black and white, only good and bad. 

If it works over time and the client makes money then good. If it doesn&#039;t then it&#039;s bad.

One day there will be a search engine that gains massive market share through a user voting system. You get paid to vote on search result relevance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s no black and white, only good and bad. </p>
<p>If it works over time and the client makes money then good. If it doesn&#8217;t then it&#8217;s bad.</p>
<p>One day there will be a search engine that gains massive market share through a user voting system. You get paid to vote on search result relevance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rtravis</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/blackhat-seo-is-it-really-pure-evil/7111/comment-page-1/#comment-1084388</link>
		<dc:creator>rtravis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 17:11:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/blackhat-seo-is-it-really-pure-evil/7111/#comment-1084388</guid>
		<description>If Google, Yahoo don&#039;t penalize cloaking keyword rich content, which is what Jim was apparently referring to, then what is the incentive to to be a whitehat?  I mean most of the top SEO experts warn  against the most egregious and isn&#039;t cloaking one of those tactics?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Google, Yahoo don&#8217;t penalize cloaking keyword rich content, which is what Jim was apparently referring to, then what is the incentive to to be a whitehat?  I mean most of the top SEO experts warn  against the most egregious and isn&#8217;t cloaking one of those tactics?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Black Knickers (lost my Hat)</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/blackhat-seo-is-it-really-pure-evil/7111/comment-page-1/#comment-1084382</link>
		<dc:creator>Black Knickers (lost my Hat)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 11:11:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/blackhat-seo-is-it-really-pure-evil/7111/#comment-1084382</guid>
		<description>Blackhat verses Whitehat is semantic nonsense.  Some stuff works, some doesn&#039;t.  And what works changes over time. 

It&#039;s not about ethics, it&#039;s about science. Google is not a God, it&#039;s a business. 

If people can find advantage in dealing with that business then more power to them.

Google is not the Internet. Google is not a law. Google is not morality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blackhat verses Whitehat is semantic nonsense.  Some stuff works, some doesn&#8217;t.  And what works changes over time. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s not about ethics, it&#8217;s about science. Google is not a God, it&#8217;s a business. </p>
<p>If people can find advantage in dealing with that business then more power to them.</p>
<p>Google is not the Internet. Google is not a law. Google is not morality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/blackhat-seo-is-it-really-pure-evil/7111/comment-page-1/#comment-1084096</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 23:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/blackhat-seo-is-it-really-pure-evil/7111/#comment-1084096</guid>
		<description>How we can consider if a SEO action is white or black? I don&#039;t think that we have a ruler for that. We are all grey SEO experts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How we can consider if a SEO action is white or black? I don&#8217;t think that we have a ruler for that. We are all grey SEO experts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek Chew</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/blackhat-seo-is-it-really-pure-evil/7111/comment-page-1/#comment-1081532</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek Chew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 23:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/blackhat-seo-is-it-really-pure-evil/7111/#comment-1081532</guid>
		<description>You did miss a tiny part. I didn&#039;t say there are no hats :) I&#039;m merely asking a rhetorical questions - And don&#039;t you agree it is all strategy? I don&#039;t see my condoning either ethical or not explicitly.

my point was - people are too worried about the &quot;hats&quot; that they tend to forget the users, who are the real receivers of your information.

You are correct in that people new to SEO are young - but you also forget that some are seasoned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You did miss a tiny part. I didn&#8217;t say there are no hats :) I&#8217;m merely asking a rhetorical questions &#8211; And don&#8217;t you agree it is all strategy? I don&#8217;t see my condoning either ethical or not explicitly.</p>
<p>my point was &#8211; people are too worried about the &#8220;hats&#8221; that they tend to forget the users, who are the real receivers of your information.</p>
<p>You are correct in that people new to SEO are young &#8211; but you also forget that some are seasoned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Heil</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/blackhat-seo-is-it-really-pure-evil/7111/comment-page-1/#comment-1081531</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Heil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 23:02:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/blackhat-seo-is-it-really-pure-evil/7111/#comment-1081531</guid>
		<description>Face value? This is what your exact posts states:

&quot;

why all the colored hats :)

It’s all about the users!

While many points are valid - let’s not forget the main reason for having a “legit” website. It’s just all strategy, and whether ethical or not - that’s just business.&quot;

That&#039;s what you wrote. Nothing about relative. You wrote that is about the users and also wrote their are no hats. In other words, you say it does not matter if you cheat or not cheat as long as you think of your users. You also state that it&#039;s just strategy, whether ethical or not.. it&#039;s just business.

I&#039;m only replying to what you actually wrote. If that is not what you wrote, I&#039;d like to know what parts I missed. :-)

I believe it&#039;s a known majority of the industry being below the age of 30. Am I wrong about that? If not, I think it surely does explain many things. Many are just out of school and even still in high school. Many have not had a what I call a real job. These are the facts.  Do you think a college kid knows business just from going to college? I think people are being taught very wrong in this industry. They read SEO blogs and attend these conferences that teach how to spam and get away with it, and how to trick others into voting up your stuff, and how to create many user accounts at digg to deceive the users, etc., and how to obtain links by creating fake content in order to deceive se&#039;s, readers, news media, and anyone else who cares.

I have missed some things, but I think that gives people a good picture of the state of things. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Face value? This is what your exact posts states:</p>
<p>&#8221;</p>
<p>why all the colored hats :)</p>
<p>It’s all about the users!</p>
<p>While many points are valid &#8211; let’s not forget the main reason for having a “legit” website. It’s just all strategy, and whether ethical or not &#8211; that’s just business.&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s what you wrote. Nothing about relative. You wrote that is about the users and also wrote their are no hats. In other words, you say it does not matter if you cheat or not cheat as long as you think of your users. You also state that it&#8217;s just strategy, whether ethical or not.. it&#8217;s just business.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m only replying to what you actually wrote. If that is not what you wrote, I&#8217;d like to know what parts I missed. :-)</p>
<p>I believe it&#8217;s a known majority of the industry being below the age of 30. Am I wrong about that? If not, I think it surely does explain many things. Many are just out of school and even still in high school. Many have not had a what I call a real job. These are the facts.  Do you think a college kid knows business just from going to college? I think people are being taught very wrong in this industry. They read SEO blogs and attend these conferences that teach how to spam and get away with it, and how to trick others into voting up your stuff, and how to create many user accounts at digg to deceive the users, etc., and how to obtain links by creating fake content in order to deceive se&#8217;s, readers, news media, and anyone else who cares.</p>
<p>I have missed some things, but I think that gives people a good picture of the state of things. :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

