<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Backlink Research : Essential&#160;Checklist</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/backlink-research-essential-checklist/7966/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/backlink-research-essential-checklist/7966/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:43:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: janetluison</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/backlink-research-essential-checklist/7966/comment-page-1/#comment-1095612</link>
		<dc:creator>janetluison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 09:28:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/backlink-research-essential-checklist/7966/#comment-1095612</guid>
		<description>oh.. so you&#039;re talking about me here. 

@ marcus, &quot;blatantly bad paid posts&quot; huh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh.. so you&#8217;re talking about me here. </p>
<p>@ marcus, &#8220;blatantly bad paid posts&#8221; huh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brent King</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/backlink-research-essential-checklist/7966/comment-page-1/#comment-1091075</link>
		<dc:creator>Brent King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 03:09:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/backlink-research-essential-checklist/7966/#comment-1091075</guid>
		<description>Interesting, I have been doing my research and still looking for the all inclusive right answer, as we all are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting, I have been doing my research and still looking for the all inclusive right answer, as we all are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mirc</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/backlink-research-essential-checklist/7966/comment-page-1/#comment-1088016</link>
		<dc:creator>mirc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 22:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/backlink-research-essential-checklist/7966/#comment-1088016</guid>
		<description>We still recommend a competitive analysis, but I agree, careful in following the crowd.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We still recommend a competitive analysis, but I agree, careful in following the crowd.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ann Smarty</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/backlink-research-essential-checklist/7966/comment-page-1/#comment-1087940</link>
		<dc:creator>Ann Smarty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 19:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/backlink-research-essential-checklist/7966/#comment-1087940</guid>
		<description>@Doug, lol... I wasn&#039;t expecting 100% positive comment from you any way :) (ok, kidding). The page you are referring to outlines some tactics that can be done in various ways...  You can submit to hundreds of spammy (networked) directories or pick just a few niche ones - and still call it &quot;directory submission&quot;. You can choose to trust my word or not but SEJ is doing quality work.

@Christopher, I wouldn&#039;t be that sure. And the post wasn&#039;t all about link buying. Most of the comments focused on that - that tells me the ‘paying for links’ hasn&#039;t really topic grown stale yet.

@Purple, you are quite right, there are really good niche directories (which are few but still can be targeted).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Doug, lol&#8230; I wasn&#8217;t expecting 100% positive comment from you any way :) (ok, kidding). The page you are referring to outlines some tactics that can be done in various ways&#8230;  You can submit to hundreds of spammy (networked) directories or pick just a few niche ones &#8211; and still call it &#8220;directory submission&#8221;. You can choose to trust my word or not but SEJ is doing quality work.</p>
<p>@Christopher, I wouldn&#8217;t be that sure. And the post wasn&#8217;t all about link buying. Most of the comments focused on that &#8211; that tells me the ‘paying for links’ hasn&#8217;t really topic grown stale yet.</p>
<p>@Purple, you are quite right, there are really good niche directories (which are few but still can be targeted).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Purple Widget</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/backlink-research-essential-checklist/7966/comment-page-1/#comment-1087934</link>
		<dc:creator>Purple Widget</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 17:29:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/backlink-research-essential-checklist/7966/#comment-1087934</guid>
		<description>Great article as always but I was a bit surprised to see the comment that directories are a time waster.  Aren&#039;t there still high quality, niche directories that provide value and can be a good kick start for links to a new site?  I think yes.

The best line in the article, sums up SEO in general:  You never know for sure which one of those links really matters.

Great stuff!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article as always but I was a bit surprised to see the comment that directories are a time waster.  Aren&#8217;t there still high quality, niche directories that provide value and can be a good kick start for links to a new site?  I think yes.</p>
<p>The best line in the article, sums up SEO in general:  You never know for sure which one of those links really matters.</p>
<p>Great stuff!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Regan</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/backlink-research-essential-checklist/7966/comment-page-1/#comment-1087932</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Regan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 16:14:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/backlink-research-essential-checklist/7966/#comment-1087932</guid>
		<description>Hasn&#039;t the &#039;paying for links&#039; topic grown stale, as it&#039;s obvious that, in the longish-haul, it&#039;s a waste of time and money. Get reciprocal links with your partners, with your company set within the landing pages URL (common sense is terribly uncommon, as is forethought). I can&#039;t see the Google link algo having an issue with this suggestion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hasn&#8217;t the &#8216;paying for links&#8217; topic grown stale, as it&#8217;s obvious that, in the longish-haul, it&#8217;s a waste of time and money. Get reciprocal links with your partners, with your company set within the landing pages URL (common sense is terribly uncommon, as is forethought). I can&#8217;t see the Google link algo having an issue with this suggestion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Maywald</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/backlink-research-essential-checklist/7966/comment-page-1/#comment-1087885</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Maywald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 21:05:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/backlink-research-essential-checklist/7966/#comment-1087885</guid>
		<description>I always love these link debates.  For me, I do whatever it takes to get a site ranked.  Regardless of what Google says, they&#039;re really about controlling spam.  If a dog bowls website is ranking for &quot;dog bowls&quot; and is buying links, should they be penalized?  What if they have a really low bounce rate...should they be removed from the first page?  What if conversions are 25% of traffic, does that make them irrelevant to the keyword &quot;Dog Bowls&quot; in which they&#039;re spending money on inbound links for? ...no.

It&#039;s Google&#039;s fault for the whole link algo anyway, they need to make better indicators of quality, like bounce rate, social aspects, etc... rather then focus on who&#039;s purchased a link.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always love these link debates.  For me, I do whatever it takes to get a site ranked.  Regardless of what Google says, they&#8217;re really about controlling spam.  If a dog bowls website is ranking for &#8220;dog bowls&#8221; and is buying links, should they be penalized?  What if they have a really low bounce rate&#8230;should they be removed from the first page?  What if conversions are 25% of traffic, does that make them irrelevant to the keyword &#8220;Dog Bowls&#8221; in which they&#8217;re spending money on inbound links for? &#8230;no.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s Google&#8217;s fault for the whole link algo anyway, they need to make better indicators of quality, like bounce rate, social aspects, etc&#8230; rather then focus on who&#8217;s purchased a link.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcus</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/backlink-research-essential-checklist/7966/comment-page-1/#comment-1087880</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 17:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/backlink-research-essential-checklist/7966/#comment-1087880</guid>
		<description>@Gary - its surprising to see them still doing so well when everyone knows their doing obvious link buys (now back at #2 for credit cards). I guess it means the less obvious buys like blatantly bad paid posts such as http://www.janetluison.com/2008/10/new-project.html will also continue to be effective.

Nice article Ann - thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Gary &#8211; its surprising to see them still doing so well when everyone knows their doing obvious link buys (now back at #2 for credit cards). I guess it means the less obvious buys like blatantly bad paid posts such as <a href="http://www.janetluison.com/2008/10/new-project.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.janetluison.com/2008/10/new-project.html</a> will also continue to be effective.</p>
<p>Nice article Ann &#8211; thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Heil</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/backlink-research-essential-checklist/7966/comment-page-1/#comment-1087869</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Heil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 14:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/backlink-research-essential-checklist/7966/#comment-1087869</guid>
		<description>Very good. Essentially you are saying that one should never get a link just because of a search engine. At least I think you are saying that.

You blog for sej; just wondering how you feel about some of these ways?
http://www.searchenginejournal.com/link-building-services/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good. Essentially you are saying that one should never get a link just because of a search engine. At least I think you are saying that.</p>
<p>You blog for sej; just wondering how you feel about some of these ways?<br />
<a href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/link-building-services/" rel="nofollow">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/link-building-services/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne Smallman</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/backlink-research-essential-checklist/7966/comment-page-1/#comment-1087867</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne Smallman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 14:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/backlink-research-essential-checklist/7966/#comment-1087867</guid>
		<description>Great advice, Ann!

&quot;Secondly, the real algorithm is a mystery even for most advanced experts: you are never sure how much value can be passed through some link.&quot;

I don&#039;t think it&#039;s worth fretting too much over the mechanical minutia. For a lot businesses on the web, all that counts is: did someone follow a link, and 2. did they perform the desired action on arrival?

Even a nofollow counts for nothing if you&#039;re an ecommerce shop, so long as people are visiting from those links and buying something!

Of course, the long-term lack of link value will hurt in some respects, but there&#039;s a lot to be said about the transaction and timeliness of a link, too...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great advice, Ann!</p>
<p>&#8220;Secondly, the real algorithm is a mystery even for most advanced experts: you are never sure how much value can be passed through some link.&#8221;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s worth fretting too much over the mechanical minutia. For a lot businesses on the web, all that counts is: did someone follow a link, and 2. did they perform the desired action on arrival?</p>
<p>Even a nofollow counts for nothing if you&#8217;re an ecommerce shop, so long as people are visiting from those links and buying something!</p>
<p>Of course, the long-term lack of link value will hurt in some respects, but there&#8217;s a lot to be said about the transaction and timeliness of a link, too&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

