<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Surprise! AdWords Ad-Serving&#160;Myth-Busting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/adwords-ad-serving-myth-busting/11126/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/adwords-ad-serving-myth-busting/11126/</link>
	<description>Latest Search Engine News from the Search Engine Journal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 20:37:12 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Miguel Gomez</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/adwords-ad-serving-myth-busting/11126/comment-page-1/#comment-1108542</link>
		<dc:creator>Miguel Gomez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 13:40:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=11126#comment-1108542</guid>
		<description>Thanks,

I had been wondering about this for a while.  I was going back and forth in my mind about which way it was working.  Thanks for clearing that up.  Nice writeup.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>I had been wondering about this for a while.  I was going back and forth in my mind about which way it was working.  Thanks for clearing that up.  Nice writeup.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve S.</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/adwords-ad-serving-myth-busting/11126/comment-page-1/#comment-1105428</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 21:35:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=11126#comment-1105428</guid>
		<description>Does dynamic keyword insertion affect ad quality score and thus impression percentage? 

I&#039;m wondering because I&#039;ve got two virtually identical ads running as A/B, with the same set of keywords (QS on those is almost all 10/10). The only difference is that I&#039;m using DKI in one of the ads&#039; headline. For the non-DKI ad, I&#039;ve got impression share of 95.45%; for the DKI ad I&#039;ve got 4.55%. AND... the non-DKI ad has a 1.48% CTR, versus 3.03% CTR for the DKI ad. (I&#039;m viewing stats for just the past 7 days here, and ad rotation is optimized.)

So, double the CTR for the DKI ad, but drastically less impression share... which is exactly the reverse of what should be happening, according to Google. 

Only thing I can figure is that there&#039;s some unseen ad quality score going on based maybe on the fact that the DKI ad has only been running for the past two weeks, versus a much longer period of time for the non-DKI ad. (Again, I&#039;m narrowing down the scope of the stats to just the past 7 days, though.) Would the newness of the DKI ad version have an effect on the ad score, and thus somehow be skewing the ad impressions it gets?

(And re: &quot;ad quality score&quot;... I keep seeing references to this term, but it seems the only real quality score that you can see in AdWords is _keyword_ quality score. There is no viewable _ad_ quality score, except for ads getting impressions on the content network. And since I just today turned on content network for this campaign, there is no existing history for content network yet.)

Confusing enough, huh? FYI, I&#039;m just coming in on this ad campaign (new job I just started a few weeks ago), so it&#039;s a bit of a muddle, but this impression percentage thing is puzzling. As Brian said, &quot;If you have it set to optimize, the better Ad Rank show will show more often, and you’ll win more auctions and get more impressions.&quot; Which isn&#039;t happening -- it&#039;s exactly the opposite. And, &quot;An ad with a lower quality score would get fewer impressions because it would show off the first page more often.&quot; Which makes me wonder how DKI would impact this... although average position for these ads is 2.8. 

Any ideas much appreciated...

Steve S.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does dynamic keyword insertion affect ad quality score and thus impression percentage? </p>
<p>I&#8217;m wondering because I&#8217;ve got two virtually identical ads running as A/B, with the same set of keywords (QS on those is almost all 10/10). The only difference is that I&#8217;m using DKI in one of the ads&#8217; headline. For the non-DKI ad, I&#8217;ve got impression share of 95.45%; for the DKI ad I&#8217;ve got 4.55%. AND&#8230; the non-DKI ad has a 1.48% CTR, versus 3.03% CTR for the DKI ad. (I&#8217;m viewing stats for just the past 7 days here, and ad rotation is optimized.)</p>
<p>So, double the CTR for the DKI ad, but drastically less impression share&#8230; which is exactly the reverse of what should be happening, according to Google. </p>
<p>Only thing I can figure is that there&#8217;s some unseen ad quality score going on based maybe on the fact that the DKI ad has only been running for the past two weeks, versus a much longer period of time for the non-DKI ad. (Again, I&#8217;m narrowing down the scope of the stats to just the past 7 days, though.) Would the newness of the DKI ad version have an effect on the ad score, and thus somehow be skewing the ad impressions it gets?</p>
<p>(And re: &#8220;ad quality score&#8221;&#8230; I keep seeing references to this term, but it seems the only real quality score that you can see in AdWords is _keyword_ quality score. There is no viewable _ad_ quality score, except for ads getting impressions on the content network. And since I just today turned on content network for this campaign, there is no existing history for content network yet.)</p>
<p>Confusing enough, huh? FYI, I&#8217;m just coming in on this ad campaign (new job I just started a few weeks ago), so it&#8217;s a bit of a muddle, but this impression percentage thing is puzzling. As Brian said, &#8220;If you have it set to optimize, the better Ad Rank show will show more often, and you’ll win more auctions and get more impressions.&#8221; Which isn&#8217;t happening &#8212; it&#8217;s exactly the opposite. And, &#8220;An ad with a lower quality score would get fewer impressions because it would show off the first page more often.&#8221; Which makes me wonder how DKI would impact this&#8230; although average position for these ads is 2.8. </p>
<p>Any ideas much appreciated&#8230;</p>
<p>Steve S.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Goodman</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/adwords-ad-serving-myth-busting/11126/comment-page-1/#comment-1103902</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Goodman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 14:45:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=11126#comment-1103902</guid>
		<description>Truthier, indeed. The &#039;more equally&#039; verbiage has been in place for about two years now. I remember my rueful grin when I stumbled across that rhetorical hedge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Truthier, indeed. The &#8216;more equally&#8217; verbiage has been in place for about two years now. I remember my rueful grin when I stumbled across that rhetorical hedge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trebuchet</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/adwords-ad-serving-myth-busting/11126/comment-page-1/#comment-1103407</link>
		<dc:creator>trebuchet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 14:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=11126#comment-1103407</guid>
		<description>Glad to see someone&#039;s bringing light to this, it&#039;s been going on for years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad to see someone&#8217;s bringing light to this, it&#8217;s been going on for years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Rothwell &#124; AdWordsAnswers.com</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/adwords-ad-serving-myth-busting/11126/comment-page-1/#comment-1103306</link>
		<dc:creator>David Rothwell &#124; AdWordsAnswers.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 08:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=11126#comment-1103306</guid>
		<description>Last post is right on the money as a reminder - always include keywords somewhere in the ad, and test in headlines first.

I could not disagree with the logic of this post, and it&#039;s useful to know (and not unsurprising), but with rotation ad impressions are pretty closely shared with no large bias one way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last post is right on the money as a reminder &#8211; always include keywords somewhere in the ad, and test in headlines first.</p>
<p>I could not disagree with the logic of this post, and it&#8217;s useful to know (and not unsurprising), but with rotation ad impressions are pretty closely shared with no large bias one way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harrison Schmidt</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/adwords-ad-serving-myth-busting/11126/comment-page-1/#comment-1103297</link>
		<dc:creator>Harrison Schmidt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 05:55:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=11126#comment-1103297</guid>
		<description>Good post.

To improve your clickthrough rate, and therefore quality score, you should set your ad headline text to include the keyword you are bidding on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post.</p>
<p>To improve your clickthrough rate, and therefore quality score, you should set your ad headline text to include the keyword you are bidding on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcos Nobre</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/adwords-ad-serving-myth-busting/11126/comment-page-1/#comment-1103275</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcos Nobre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 20:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=11126#comment-1103275</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s see (urls blocked):
What are ways to improve my Impression Share?
Nothing about ad serving.

How does Impression Share reflect on my campaign&#039;s performance?
Nada.

How is my daily budget distributed?
Nope but Oh there it is a helpful article:
Which ad delivery option is best for my campaign?
Oh not that helpful...that&#039;s sad.

Better check again ClickEquation Craig Danuloff&#039;s amazing articles about impression share .

Thanks a lot Brian!
Most important PPC article this year so far!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s see (urls blocked):<br />
What are ways to improve my Impression Share?<br />
Nothing about ad serving.</p>
<p>How does Impression Share reflect on my campaign&#8217;s performance?<br />
Nada.</p>
<p>How is my daily budget distributed?<br />
Nope but Oh there it is a helpful article:<br />
Which ad delivery option is best for my campaign?<br />
Oh not that helpful&#8230;that&#8217;s sad.</p>
<p>Better check again ClickEquation Craig Danuloff&#8217;s amazing articles about impression share .</p>
<p>Thanks a lot Brian!<br />
Most important PPC article this year so far!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcos Nobre</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/adwords-ad-serving-myth-busting/11126/comment-page-1/#comment-1103270</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcos Nobre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 19:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=11126#comment-1103270</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve always hated the fact that CTR is kinda black box because Gevil has never disclosed  real &quot;kwXad&quot; CTR. Though I&#039;ve never realized they&#039;ve being screwing impression share because of that!
I&#039;m quite sure there isn&#039;t any mention about that in impression share help files. I&#039;ll check that out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve always hated the fact that CTR is kinda black box because Gevil has never disclosed  real &#8220;kwXad&#8221; CTR. Though I&#8217;ve never realized they&#8217;ve being screwing impression share because of that!<br />
I&#8217;m quite sure there isn&#8217;t any mention about that in impression share help files. I&#8217;ll check that out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Carter</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/adwords-ad-serving-myth-busting/11126/comment-page-1/#comment-1103268</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Carter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 19:20:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=11126#comment-1103268</guid>
		<description>THAT i COMPLETELY agree with, LOL.  Even people who are good readers can&#039;t just read all the help screens and expect to get everything. Just checking the index for Andrew Goodman&#039;s second edition book and it&#039;s not clarified there either. Eventually, we might need some comprehensive training courses that are university level- there&#039;s a lot out there but nothing that teaches you EVERYTHING, is there? Such as it is, it takes a lot of study and years of practice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THAT i COMPLETELY agree with, LOL.  Even people who are good readers can&#8217;t just read all the help screens and expect to get everything. Just checking the index for Andrew Goodman&#8217;s second edition book and it&#8217;s not clarified there either. Eventually, we might need some comprehensive training courses that are university level- there&#8217;s a lot out there but nothing that teaches you EVERYTHING, is there? Such as it is, it takes a lot of study and years of practice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brad aka eWhisper</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/adwords-ad-serving-myth-busting/11126/comment-page-1/#comment-1103267</link>
		<dc:creator>brad aka eWhisper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 19:13:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=11126#comment-1103267</guid>
		<description>Actually, I misread something you said. 

Either way, it&#039;s a good reminder that not everything is as it appears in AdWords and you often have to look deeper for the answer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I misread something you said. </p>
<p>Either way, it&#8217;s a good reminder that not everything is as it appears in AdWords and you often have to look deeper for the answer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
