<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Adam Lasnik of Google on Paid Links &amp;&#160;NoFollow</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/adam-lasnik-of-google-on-paid-links-nofollow/4473/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/adam-lasnik-of-google-on-paid-links-nofollow/4473/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:43:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Long Term Advertising</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/adam-lasnik-of-google-on-paid-links-nofollow/4473/comment-page-1/#comment-453854</link>
		<dc:creator>Long Term Advertising</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 16:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=4473#comment-453854</guid>
		<description>Penalties... lol    Is Google 
A coach ?
A referee ? 
A Parent ?

Google has met it&#039;s match, and it&#039;s us.  It better join us and help us sell better links or keep quiet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Penalties&#8230; lol    Is Google<br />
A coach ?<br />
A referee ?<br />
A Parent ?</p>
<p>Google has met it&#8217;s match, and it&#8217;s us.  It better join us and help us sell better links or keep quiet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter (IMC)</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/adam-lasnik-of-google-on-paid-links-nofollow/4473/comment-page-1/#comment-452180</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter (IMC)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 03:13:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=4473#comment-452180</guid>
		<description>&quot; It’d be great if we could return to a more innocent time when practically all links to other sites really WERE true votes, folks clearly vouching for a site on behalf of their users.&quot;

So there was no advertising done before Google? Advertising links always existed and they were paid for in those days too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; It’d be great if we could return to a more innocent time when practically all links to other sites really WERE true votes, folks clearly vouching for a site on behalf of their users.&#8221;</p>
<p>So there was no advertising done before Google? Advertising links always existed and they were paid for in those days too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andi</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/adam-lasnik-of-google-on-paid-links-nofollow/4473/comment-page-1/#comment-450459</link>
		<dc:creator>Andi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 05:52:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=4473#comment-450459</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t buy or sell links but I have put nofollow on all OB links as a default and have then selectively removed it from sites that I would like to represent as my profile to Google. 

I don&#039;t think Google can be trusted to get it right.  They&#039;re not evil but neither is their method sophisticated enough for naive confidence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t buy or sell links but I have put nofollow on all OB links as a default and have then selectively removed it from sites that I would like to represent as my profile to Google. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think Google can be trusted to get it right.  They&#8217;re not evil but neither is their method sophisticated enough for naive confidence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter (IMC)</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/adam-lasnik-of-google-on-paid-links-nofollow/4473/comment-page-1/#comment-450357</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter (IMC)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 04:31:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=4473#comment-450357</guid>
		<description>Now this is some useful information. I wish Matt Cutts would be more clear sometimes. But I guess he just isn&#039;t the engineer anymore, but more the manager that knows that what ever he says can and will be used against him in the court of what ever...  This case though, being less clear had quite the opposite effect.

Good to see that Google is “perfectly fine with people buying and selling links”. That makes sense. I can understand that they like some help through the nofollow because it simply isn&#039;t that easy to detect the intention of a link. (just for PR or for the visitor.) Very happy to see that the idea of &quot;use nofollow or else....&quot; is not correct. But that that idea had came up is understandable in an age of &quot;either with us or against us&quot;... ;)

Serious publishers will never sell advertising to whoever. A normal website editor won&#039;t simply put whatever in their site, also, or more likely, especially when it comes down to advertisers. You can&#039;t have your audience leave you because of who you link to. I would even go so far that many visitors would rather leave because of who you allow to advertise in your site, than a link in a page that simply says that the site linked to is bad.

This whole thing will pass over,. Matt can sleep normally again,. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now this is some useful information. I wish Matt Cutts would be more clear sometimes. But I guess he just isn&#8217;t the engineer anymore, but more the manager that knows that what ever he says can and will be used against him in the court of what ever&#8230;  This case though, being less clear had quite the opposite effect.</p>
<p>Good to see that Google is “perfectly fine with people buying and selling links”. That makes sense. I can understand that they like some help through the nofollow because it simply isn&#8217;t that easy to detect the intention of a link. (just for PR or for the visitor.) Very happy to see that the idea of &#8220;use nofollow or else&#8230;.&#8221; is not correct. But that that idea had came up is understandable in an age of &#8220;either with us or against us&#8221;&#8230; ;)</p>
<p>Serious publishers will never sell advertising to whoever. A normal website editor won&#8217;t simply put whatever in their site, also, or more likely, especially when it comes down to advertisers. You can&#8217;t have your audience leave you because of who you link to. I would even go so far that many visitors would rather leave because of who you allow to advertise in your site, than a link in a page that simply says that the site linked to is bad.</p>
<p>This whole thing will pass over,. Matt can sleep normally again,. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucas Castro</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/adam-lasnik-of-google-on-paid-links-nofollow/4473/comment-page-1/#comment-409854</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucas Castro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2007 03:32:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=4473#comment-409854</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s hard to find a paid link pattern. There is no simple way to do this, so it is really hard to figure out if the link is a paid or not.

A good point, is advice ppl that if they link to a site that is someway flagged as web spammer, they will be penalized too. There must be responsability in the linking act.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s hard to find a paid link pattern. There is no simple way to do this, so it is really hard to figure out if the link is a paid or not.</p>
<p>A good point, is advice ppl that if they link to a site that is someway flagged as web spammer, they will be penalized too. There must be responsability in the linking act.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/adam-lasnik-of-google-on-paid-links-nofollow/4473/comment-page-1/#comment-409802</link>
		<dc:creator>Max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2007 01:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=4473#comment-409802</guid>
		<description>The sooner the engines move away from such a heavy reliance on link based results in the alog the better - When and if this will ever happen is a good question. It&#039;s made a big mess all over the web, I remember the old days when you traded links to get visitors to your site and would never ever consider a link based on anything else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The sooner the engines move away from such a heavy reliance on link based results in the alog the better &#8211; When and if this will ever happen is a good question. It&#8217;s made a big mess all over the web, I remember the old days when you traded links to get visitors to your site and would never ever consider a link based on anything else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wendy Piersall</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/adam-lasnik-of-google-on-paid-links-nofollow/4473/comment-page-1/#comment-408328</link>
		<dc:creator>Wendy Piersall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 21:01:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=4473#comment-408328</guid>
		<description>I find Google&#039;s attitude both dangerous and based on faulty logic. Just because a link is paid for on a site, certainly doesn&#039;t mean that it should be valued less. What about an affiliate link that points straight to a site? What if the site I&#039;m linking to is relevant?

I deserve to be compensated for the benefit that my advertising client gets for the traffic that I send over. I PAY to get  these visitors to my site in the first place (via PPC, advertising, or long hours spent on content creation, PR and promotion).

Is there something wrong with advertisers wanting to earn better rankings from paid links? Google certainly benefits from this business model, why shouldn&#039;t advertisers? 

Oh, I could go on and on.... but I&#039;m starting to feel a bit irritated with the premise of Google&#039;s thinking and that&#039;s my signal to shut up. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find Google&#8217;s attitude both dangerous and based on faulty logic. Just because a link is paid for on a site, certainly doesn&#8217;t mean that it should be valued less. What about an affiliate link that points straight to a site? What if the site I&#8217;m linking to is relevant?</p>
<p>I deserve to be compensated for the benefit that my advertising client gets for the traffic that I send over. I PAY to get  these visitors to my site in the first place (via PPC, advertising, or long hours spent on content creation, PR and promotion).</p>
<p>Is there something wrong with advertisers wanting to earn better rankings from paid links? Google certainly benefits from this business model, why shouldn&#8217;t advertisers? </p>
<p>Oh, I could go on and on&#8230;. but I&#8217;m starting to feel a bit irritated with the premise of Google&#8217;s thinking and that&#8217;s my signal to shut up. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CarstenCumbrowski</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/adam-lasnik-of-google-on-paid-links-nofollow/4473/comment-page-1/#comment-408315</link>
		<dc:creator>CarstenCumbrowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 20:43:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=4473#comment-408315</guid>
		<description>Google just want webmasters to put Google AdSense up and nothing else to monetize the site. 

The things is that paid or not paid has nothing to do with vouching for or not. The two do not necessarily conflict each other. I link to what I like and sometimes to what I hate (knowing a thing or two about SEO makes me nofollow them), if I get compensated be it via revenue share, PPC, CPM or flat $ amount is even better. 

I can write about what I love and share my experiences with others and get paid while doing so and are able to pay my landlord who gives about Ranking algo&#039;s as much as the color of the monthly lease check he gets. 

Again, this is rubbish. Is it about the vote or is it about money? It&#039;s about money! Stock the BS and just admit it and get over it. 

It&#039;s not the first example of Google bending their own set rules and it will not be the last time either. Its not the nice and cute Google from 2000 anymore, it&#039;s a several hundred billion dollars big corporate behemoth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google just want webmasters to put Google AdSense up and nothing else to monetize the site. </p>
<p>The things is that paid or not paid has nothing to do with vouching for or not. The two do not necessarily conflict each other. I link to what I like and sometimes to what I hate (knowing a thing or two about SEO makes me nofollow them), if I get compensated be it via revenue share, PPC, CPM or flat $ amount is even better. </p>
<p>I can write about what I love and share my experiences with others and get paid while doing so and are able to pay my landlord who gives about Ranking algo&#8217;s as much as the color of the monthly lease check he gets. </p>
<p>Again, this is rubbish. Is it about the vote or is it about money? It&#8217;s about money! Stock the BS and just admit it and get over it. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s not the first example of Google bending their own set rules and it will not be the last time either. Its not the nice and cute Google from 2000 anymore, it&#8217;s a several hundred billion dollars big corporate behemoth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/adam-lasnik-of-google-on-paid-links-nofollow/4473/comment-page-1/#comment-408265</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 19:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=4473#comment-408265</guid>
		<description>This has to be the perfect match -- in the feed, on the footer of this post:
&quot;Advertisement: Text Link Ads Smart Link Marketing&quot;
:-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This has to be the perfect match &#8212; in the feed, on the footer of this post:<br />
&#8220;Advertisement: Text Link Ads Smart Link Marketing&#8221;<br />
:-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

