<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A week worth of treats for SEO&#160;geeks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/a-week-worth-of-treats-for-seo-geeks/14761/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/a-week-worth-of-treats-for-seo-geeks/14761/</link>
	<description>Latest Search Engine News from the Search Engine Journal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 14:34:20 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Buzzlord</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/a-week-worth-of-treats-for-seo-geeks/14761/comment-page-1/#comment-1147186</link>
		<dc:creator>Buzzlord</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 19:38:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=14761#comment-1147186</guid>
		<description>I think the page load speed is interesting.  I wonder how important it will be in ranking your page?

Will this spawn a bunch of hosting companies promising to juice your Google ranking by loading your page extremely fast?  

I think this will also punish cheap hosting companies because their customers will want faster loading pages...  But I do think it is good that Google gives a bit of a rankings boost to a site investing more in faster hosting -- all things bein equal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the page load speed is interesting.  I wonder how important it will be in ranking your page?</p>
<p>Will this spawn a bunch of hosting companies promising to juice your Google ranking by loading your page extremely fast?  </p>
<p>I think this will also punish cheap hosting companies because their customers will want faster loading pages&#8230;  But I do think it is good that Google gives a bit of a rankings boost to a site investing more in faster hosting &#8212; all things bein equal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
