<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 8 Key Points to Multiple Niche Sites And Controlling Back&#160;Links</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/8-key-points-to-multiple-niche-sites-and-controlling-back-links/10597/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/8-key-points-to-multiple-niche-sites-and-controlling-back-links/10597/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 00:21:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elvin</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/8-key-points-to-multiple-niche-sites-and-controlling-back-links/10597/comment-page-1/#comment-1271470</link>
		<dc:creator>Elvin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 14:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=10597#comment-1271470</guid>
		<description>I have a domain and i want multiple categories on it, probably in subdomains. Please give me an advice. Is it okay to have this kind of website? or do i have to purchase a domain for every topic? That would be very expensive. Thanks ahead!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a domain and i want multiple categories on it, probably in subdomains. Please give me an advice. Is it okay to have this kind of website? or do i have to purchase a domain for every topic? That would be very expensive. Thanks ahead!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elvin</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/8-key-points-to-multiple-niche-sites-and-controlling-back-links/10597/comment-page-1/#comment-1256082</link>
		<dc:creator>Elvin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 09:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=10597#comment-1256082</guid>
		<description>I have a domain and i want multiple categories on it, probably in subdomains. Please give me an advice. Is it okay to have this kind of website? or do i have to purchase a domain for every topic? That would be very expensive. Thanks ahead!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a domain and i want multiple categories on it, probably in subdomains. Please give me an advice. Is it okay to have this kind of website? or do i have to purchase a domain for every topic? That would be very expensive. Thanks ahead!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Bleiweiss</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/8-key-points-to-multiple-niche-sites-and-controlling-back-links/10597/comment-page-1/#comment-1167552</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Bleiweiss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 21:17:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=10597#comment-1167552</guid>
		<description>Andy,

Wow - long delay in responding.  somehow I missed your comment, and only found it upon a long overdue revisit here.  Anyhow - sub-domains vs dedicated primary domains...  

By having sub-domains, you ultimately build up the depth of overall content associated with the primary domain, so there&#039;s that to consider, given how important overall depth can be.   But links from sub-domains aren&#039;t truly &quot;inbound&quot;.  

Since this article was about inbound link building, then In my experience, having stand-alone niche domains offers the most potential in terms of inbound link value.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andy,</p>
<p>Wow &#8211; long delay in responding.  somehow I missed your comment, and only found it upon a long overdue revisit here.  Anyhow &#8211; sub-domains vs dedicated primary domains&#8230;  </p>
<p>By having sub-domains, you ultimately build up the depth of overall content associated with the primary domain, so there&#8217;s that to consider, given how important overall depth can be.   But links from sub-domains aren&#8217;t truly &#8220;inbound&#8221;.  </p>
<p>Since this article was about inbound link building, then In my experience, having stand-alone niche domains offers the most potential in terms of inbound link value.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/8-key-points-to-multiple-niche-sites-and-controlling-back-links/10597/comment-page-1/#comment-1149751</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 12:55:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=10597#comment-1149751</guid>
		<description>Alan, really great article- thanks for making all your hard won wisdom available. there are great ideas here so thanks.

Quick question - can you use subdomains of the main domain for niche sites or should they be separate top level domains?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alan, really great article- thanks for making all your hard won wisdom available. there are great ideas here so thanks.</p>
<p>Quick question &#8211; can you use subdomains of the main domain for niche sites or should they be separate top level domains?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hire staff</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/8-key-points-to-multiple-niche-sites-and-controlling-back-links/10597/comment-page-1/#comment-1109763</link>
		<dc:creator>hire staff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 15:12:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=10597#comment-1109763</guid>
		<description>Very nice concept cool?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice concept cool?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Bleiweiss</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/8-key-points-to-multiple-niche-sites-and-controlling-back-links/10597/comment-page-1/#comment-1106493</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Bleiweiss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 22:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=10597#comment-1106493</guid>
		<description>Raza, 

Yes - the concept is similar.  However Squidoo lenses and the like are at a serious disadvantage compared to my method.  

On the one hand, one or more pages within Squidoo can themselves be a good source for linking - they carry the weight of the entire Squidoo domain.  

On the other hand however, because I create entire multi-page stand-alone web sites, each dedicated domain can ultimately carry a great deal more relevant weight when it comes to how closely two or more entire sites relate to each other.    

So while your single relevant page is more valuable from a linking perspective because it&#039;s one of 900,000 pages (and thus the link from that page is considered to be coming from an &quot;authority&quot; site), it&#039;s an extremely diluted link because it is only one page on the subject matter.  

Of course, the cost involved with my approach can be far beyond what most people can afford or justify and that&#039;s why having Squidoo lenses can definitely help as part of a much more cost conscious approach if a site&#039;s budget requires that much constraint.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Raza, </p>
<p>Yes &#8211; the concept is similar.  However Squidoo lenses and the like are at a serious disadvantage compared to my method.  </p>
<p>On the one hand, one or more pages within Squidoo can themselves be a good source for linking &#8211; they carry the weight of the entire Squidoo domain.  </p>
<p>On the other hand however, because I create entire multi-page stand-alone web sites, each dedicated domain can ultimately carry a great deal more relevant weight when it comes to how closely two or more entire sites relate to each other.    </p>
<p>So while your single relevant page is more valuable from a linking perspective because it&#8217;s one of 900,000 pages (and thus the link from that page is considered to be coming from an &#8220;authority&#8221; site), it&#8217;s an extremely diluted link because it is only one page on the subject matter.  </p>
<p>Of course, the cost involved with my approach can be far beyond what most people can afford or justify and that&#8217;s why having Squidoo lenses can definitely help as part of a much more cost conscious approach if a site&#8217;s budget requires that much constraint.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raza Imam</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/8-key-points-to-multiple-niche-sites-and-controlling-back-links/10597/comment-page-1/#comment-1106491</link>
		<dc:creator>Raza Imam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 21:55:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=10597#comment-1106491</guid>
		<description>Really solid, well thought out, long term info here.

I first learned about SEO from Ed Dale and his 30 Day Challenge. They employ a similar system, but they use web 2.0 properties instead of creating their own mini-sites. They set up a money page, and then they create Squidoo lenses, HubPages, etc. with links pointing back to the money page. Over time the money page shoots up in the ranks. Seems like your approach is the same thing, but 10x&#039;s larger.

You&#039;re building a web of trustworthy sites and obviously Google (not to mention your client) appreciates your hard work and careful planning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really solid, well thought out, long term info here.</p>
<p>I first learned about SEO from Ed Dale and his 30 Day Challenge. They employ a similar system, but they use web 2.0 properties instead of creating their own mini-sites. They set up a money page, and then they create Squidoo lenses, HubPages, etc. with links pointing back to the money page. Over time the money page shoots up in the ranks. Seems like your approach is the same thing, but 10x&#8217;s larger.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re building a web of trustworthy sites and obviously Google (not to mention your client) appreciates your hard work and careful planning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Bleiweiss</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/8-key-points-to-multiple-niche-sites-and-controlling-back-links/10597/comment-page-1/#comment-1103771</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Bleiweiss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 21:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=10597#comment-1103771</guid>
		<description>Hello Finland!  Jan, I&#039;m glad to hear you found real value in the article.  Don&#039;t hesitate to ask if you have questions after discussing with your client.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Finland!  Jan, I&#8217;m glad to hear you found real value in the article.  Don&#8217;t hesitate to ask if you have questions after discussing with your client.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/8-key-points-to-multiple-niche-sites-and-controlling-back-links/10597/comment-page-1/#comment-1103770</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 20:43:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=10597#comment-1103770</guid>
		<description>Greetings from Finland Alan!

I found your article great and subscribed to your Search Marketing Answers blog as well.  This gave me supreme tools to approach a client of mine. They are going to be excited.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greetings from Finland Alan!</p>
<p>I found your article great and subscribed to your Search Marketing Answers blog as well.  This gave me supreme tools to approach a client of mine. They are going to be excited.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/8-key-points-to-multiple-niche-sites-and-controlling-back-links/10597/comment-page-1/#comment-1103095</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 19:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=10597#comment-1103095</guid>
		<description>Thanx for your swift reply, Alan! 

In most cases the clients won&#039;t be happy if the Niche site overtakes the main website, but there may be cases where they don&#039;t mind. 

Looking forward to your next article! Have a good weekend ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanx for your swift reply, Alan! </p>
<p>In most cases the clients won&#8217;t be happy if the Niche site overtakes the main website, but there may be cases where they don&#8217;t mind. </p>
<p>Looking forward to your next article! Have a good weekend ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

