<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 5 Common AdWords Myths Absolutely&#160;Destroyed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/5-common-adwords-myths-absolutely-destroyed/8243/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/5-common-adwords-myths-absolutely-destroyed/8243/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:43:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: detoxtechno</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/5-common-adwords-myths-absolutely-destroyed/8243/comment-page-1/#comment-1122760</link>
		<dc:creator>detoxtechno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 03:21:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/5-common-adwords-myths-absolutely-destroyed/8243/#comment-1122760</guid>
		<description>Adwords is really great for promoting your website and also affiliate links. i have just passed the Google Adwords Professional exam today and i am very happy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adwords is really great for promoting your website and also affiliate links. i have just passed the Google Adwords Professional exam today and i am very happy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Website. designer in mumbai</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/5-common-adwords-myths-absolutely-destroyed/8243/comment-page-1/#comment-1105710</link>
		<dc:creator>Website. designer in mumbai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 13:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/5-common-adwords-myths-absolutely-destroyed/8243/#comment-1105710</guid>
		<description>Thanks a lot .... this will really be very helpful and the matter of the fact is the whole content fall so smoothly at place .... make it very readable .... appreciate the effort.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks a lot &#8230;. this will really be very helpful and the matter of the fact is the whole content fall so smoothly at place &#8230;. make it very readable &#8230;. appreciate the effort.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: petes2cents</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/5-common-adwords-myths-absolutely-destroyed/8243/comment-page-1/#comment-1094095</link>
		<dc:creator>petes2cents</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 04:37:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/5-common-adwords-myths-absolutely-destroyed/8243/#comment-1094095</guid>
		<description>Finally someone that knows what there talking about and makes COMMON sense. Great List. I just added you to my rss reader. Thanks...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finally someone that knows what there talking about and makes COMMON sense. Great List. I just added you to my rss reader. Thanks&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David - LA Marketing Firm</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/5-common-adwords-myths-absolutely-destroyed/8243/comment-page-1/#comment-1091750</link>
		<dc:creator>David - LA Marketing Firm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 04:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/5-common-adwords-myths-absolutely-destroyed/8243/#comment-1091750</guid>
		<description>I go against google&#039;s best practices by putting in broad phrase and exact match keywords into the camapaigns. This allows me to get more specific responses from the search query report.

I would add another big misconception that smaller business owners have, and that is that they often have a small budget, but &quot;must be on the first page&quot; for high volume keywords. Instead, the best practice for them is to bid much lower and they will get 2 - 5 times the volume. I&#039;ve done that for a number of clients...

I recently posted a question on twitter about how to convince business owners of the problem, and got some great responses:
http://www.linkedin.com/answers/marketing-sales/advertising-promotion/internet-marketing/MAR_ADP_INM/385962-10668879?browseIdx=1&amp;sik=1231390521614&amp;goback=.amq

summarized at: 
http://www.liveinternetmarketing.com/articles/show/25

Excuse the self promotion - I think it&#039;s valuable to the community :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I go against google&#8217;s best practices by putting in broad phrase and exact match keywords into the camapaigns. This allows me to get more specific responses from the search query report.</p>
<p>I would add another big misconception that smaller business owners have, and that is that they often have a small budget, but &#8220;must be on the first page&#8221; for high volume keywords. Instead, the best practice for them is to bid much lower and they will get 2 &#8211; 5 times the volume. I&#8217;ve done that for a number of clients&#8230;</p>
<p>I recently posted a question on twitter about how to convince business owners of the problem, and got some great responses:<br />
<a href="http://www.linkedin.com/answers/marketing-sales/advertising-promotion/internet-marketing/MAR_ADP_INM/385962-10668879?browseIdx=1&#038;sik=1231390521614&#038;goback=.amq" rel="nofollow">http://www.linkedin.com/answers/marketing-sales/advertising-promotion/internet-marketing/MAR_ADP_INM/385962-10668879?browseIdx=1&#038;sik=1231390521614&#038;goback=.amq</a></p>
<p>summarized at:<br />
<a href="http://www.liveinternetmarketing.com/articles/show/25" rel="nofollow">http://www.liveinternetmarketing.com/articles/show/25</a></p>
<p>Excuse the self promotion &#8211; I think it&#8217;s valuable to the community :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/5-common-adwords-myths-absolutely-destroyed/8243/comment-page-1/#comment-1091730</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 19:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/5-common-adwords-myths-absolutely-destroyed/8243/#comment-1091730</guid>
		<description>Rob -

I agree with using broad matches to gather data, if anything you are getting good learnings from the use of the broad match.

I would recommend using phrase matches and exact matches (which I am sure you are doing through your learnings)  for terms like cheap trumpet and bargain trumpet, but you are right.  There is no way to really negative match trumpet.

Good to hear that SEM has helped you provide your clients with decent ROAS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rob -</p>
<p>I agree with using broad matches to gather data, if anything you are getting good learnings from the use of the broad match.</p>
<p>I would recommend using phrase matches and exact matches (which I am sure you are doing through your learnings)  for terms like cheap trumpet and bargain trumpet, but you are right.  There is no way to really negative match trumpet.</p>
<p>Good to hear that SEM has helped you provide your clients with decent ROAS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Taylor</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/5-common-adwords-myths-absolutely-destroyed/8243/comment-page-1/#comment-1091729</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 19:39:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/5-common-adwords-myths-absolutely-destroyed/8243/#comment-1091729</guid>
		<description>@richard I guess it&#039;s the part about Google doing what it &quot;feels&quot; instead of what I want that bugs me. 

If I wanted to bid on plain &#039;ole &quot;trumpet&quot; I would. By including a qualifier I am indicating that I want to attract a sub-section of the general market. 

I wouldn&#039;t have a problem with G matching for &quot;cheap trumpet&quot; or &quot;bargain trumpet&quot; but matching for the term without a qualifier seems illogical to me. Plus there is no way to negative around it.

IMHO broad match is only useful now for figuring out what phrase match terms to bid on. My strategy is to broad match initially, gather data, switch to phrase match and then periodically turn on broad match to make sure we aren&#039;t missing any good terms. 

This has resulted in lower campaign cost and I am sure we have lost a few sales as a result of it but it is the only way I can get decent ROAS for a lot of my clients.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@richard I guess it&#8217;s the part about Google doing what it &#8220;feels&#8221; instead of what I want that bugs me. </p>
<p>If I wanted to bid on plain &#8216;ole &#8220;trumpet&#8221; I would. By including a qualifier I am indicating that I want to attract a sub-section of the general market. </p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t have a problem with G matching for &#8220;cheap trumpet&#8221; or &#8220;bargain trumpet&#8221; but matching for the term without a qualifier seems illogical to me. Plus there is no way to negative around it.</p>
<p>IMHO broad match is only useful now for figuring out what phrase match terms to bid on. My strategy is to broad match initially, gather data, switch to phrase match and then periodically turn on broad match to make sure we aren&#8217;t missing any good terms. </p>
<p>This has resulted in lower campaign cost and I am sure we have lost a few sales as a result of it but it is the only way I can get decent ROAS for a lot of my clients.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/5-common-adwords-myths-absolutely-destroyed/8243/comment-page-1/#comment-1091727</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 19:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/5-common-adwords-myths-absolutely-destroyed/8243/#comment-1091727</guid>
		<description>Rob -

I agree that Google&#039;s algorithms are tipped in Google&#039;s favor, but in the case of discount trumpets, initially, Google feels that someone searching for trumpets would also be interested in discount trumpets.  To counter act that, Search Marketers use phrase matches, exact matches, and negative matches to refine what terms they are actually willing to pay for.

Ideally, search marketers can use broad matches to get potential consumers in the conversion funnel, or reach consumers during the information search portion of the funnel, using phrase matches and exact matches to convert on consumers who are deeper in the funnel.

But, yeah, sometimes the broad matches can get advertisers in trouble if we are focusing on strict KPI&#039;s.  But broad matches play a role in driving conversions, and should be incorporated into advertisers search portfolios.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rob -</p>
<p>I agree that Google&#8217;s algorithms are tipped in Google&#8217;s favor, but in the case of discount trumpets, initially, Google feels that someone searching for trumpets would also be interested in discount trumpets.  To counter act that, Search Marketers use phrase matches, exact matches, and negative matches to refine what terms they are actually willing to pay for.</p>
<p>Ideally, search marketers can use broad matches to get potential consumers in the conversion funnel, or reach consumers during the information search portion of the funnel, using phrase matches and exact matches to convert on consumers who are deeper in the funnel.</p>
<p>But, yeah, sometimes the broad matches can get advertisers in trouble if we are focusing on strict KPI&#8217;s.  But broad matches play a role in driving conversions, and should be incorporated into advertisers search portfolios.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carps</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/5-common-adwords-myths-absolutely-destroyed/8243/comment-page-1/#comment-1091714</link>
		<dc:creator>Carps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 13:59:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/5-common-adwords-myths-absolutely-destroyed/8243/#comment-1091714</guid>
		<description>One of the last points was the one that really stood out for me: &quot;AdWords is just maths&quot;. I find it amazing that business leaders - people who are ostensibly used to dealing with the bottom line - don&#039;t seem to get that point. I took over a campaign last year where they were spending £3k a month and not even getting that back in sales, let alone profiting... this had gone on for months...

The same company water down their washing up liquid!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the last points was the one that really stood out for me: &#8220;AdWords is just maths&#8221;. I find it amazing that business leaders &#8211; people who are ostensibly used to dealing with the bottom line &#8211; don&#8217;t seem to get that point. I took over a campaign last year where they were spending £3k a month and not even getting that back in sales, let alone profiting&#8230; this had gone on for months&#8230;</p>
<p>The same company water down their washing up liquid!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Danuloff</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/5-common-adwords-myths-absolutely-destroyed/8243/comment-page-1/#comment-1091668</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Danuloff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 17:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/5-common-adwords-myths-absolutely-destroyed/8243/#comment-1091668</guid>
		<description>Very good list. Regarding myths #2, #3, and #4, don&#039;t forget that the average position reported is of questionable value - and a lot of &#039;positioning&#039; and &#039;bidding&#039; decisions are being made based on it. (more here: http://www.clickequations.com/blog/2009/01/keyword-average-position/) While Google may not be out to get you, the important lesson is that they&#039;re not trying to help you any more than they have to, and they&#039;re not above sharing misleading or questionable data.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good list. Regarding myths #2, #3, and #4, don&#8217;t forget that the average position reported is of questionable value &#8211; and a lot of &#8216;positioning&#8217; and &#8216;bidding&#8217; decisions are being made based on it. (more here: <a href="http://www.clickequations.com/blog/2009/01/keyword-average-position/" rel="nofollow">http://www.clickequations.com/blog/2009/01/keyword-average-position/</a>) While Google may not be out to get you, the important lesson is that they&#8217;re not trying to help you any more than they have to, and they&#8217;re not above sharing misleading or questionable data.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Adwords Professional</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/5-common-adwords-myths-absolutely-destroyed/8243/comment-page-1/#comment-1091666</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Adwords Professional</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 16:59:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/5-common-adwords-myths-absolutely-destroyed/8243/#comment-1091666</guid>
		<description>I just got off a chat about negative broad match...
I had a click on &quot;19 birthday idea&quot; query, triggered by event ideas, broad match.

That&#039;s understandable, except that I had a negative broad match: 19th birthday ideas

Chat suggested I add that as a negative as well as the negative broad did not &quot;catch&quot; it.

What a double standard! Jeez.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just got off a chat about negative broad match&#8230;<br />
I had a click on &#8220;19 birthday idea&#8221; query, triggered by event ideas, broad match.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s understandable, except that I had a negative broad match: 19th birthday ideas</p>
<p>Chat suggested I add that as a negative as well as the negative broad did not &#8220;catch&#8221; it.</p>
<p>What a double standard! Jeez.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

