<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 4 Ways to Hide Content From Google : And Google&#8217;s&#160;Reaction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/4-ways-to-hide-content-from-google-and-googles-reaction/6782/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/4-ways-to-hide-content-from-google-and-googles-reaction/6782/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 00:21:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Señor Muñoz</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/4-ways-to-hide-content-from-google-and-googles-reaction/6782/comment-page-1/#comment-1083066</link>
		<dc:creator>Señor Muñoz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 14:40:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/4-ways-to-hide-content-from-google-and-googles-reaction/6782/#comment-1083066</guid>
		<description>During this week I was wondering how to give links to my user but not for Google. 
Instead a javascript I was triying to use a flash menu (in order to control my linkjuice without using a rel=&#039;nofollow&#039;)... any idea will be welcome!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>During this week I was wondering how to give links to my user but not for Google.<br />
Instead a javascript I was triying to use a flash menu (in order to control my linkjuice without using a rel=&#8217;nofollow&#8217;)&#8230; any idea will be welcome!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/4-ways-to-hide-content-from-google-and-googles-reaction/6782/comment-page-1/#comment-1075668</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 17:43:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/4-ways-to-hide-content-from-google-and-googles-reaction/6782/#comment-1075668</guid>
		<description>I would&#039;nt be suprised it Google was able to crawl javascript links.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would&#8217;nt be suprised it Google was able to crawl javascript links.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rhyaniwyn</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/4-ways-to-hide-content-from-google-and-googles-reaction/6782/comment-page-1/#comment-1075630</link>
		<dc:creator>Rhyaniwyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 21:21:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/4-ways-to-hide-content-from-google-and-googles-reaction/6782/#comment-1075630</guid>
		<description>Funny that a company which is developing a search for &quot;accessible&quot; sites (http://labs.google.com/accessible/) would penalize sites for using techniques specifically intended to make those sites accessible.  I have to question whether (taking into account good web design and development practices) it is good advice to sacrifice accessibility for the mere possibility of search engine penalties.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny that a company which is developing a search for &#8220;accessible&#8221; sites (<a href="http://labs.google.com/accessible/" rel="nofollow">http://labs.google.com/accessible/</a>) would penalize sites for using techniques specifically intended to make those sites accessible.  I have to question whether (taking into account good web design and development practices) it is good advice to sacrifice accessibility for the mere possibility of search engine penalties.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

