<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 3 Broken Link Checkers Reviewed and&#160;Compared</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/3-broken-link-checkers-reviewed-and-compared/13011/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/3-broken-link-checkers-reviewed-and-compared/13011/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:43:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xenu</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/3-broken-link-checkers-reviewed-and-compared/13011/comment-page-1/#comment-1271403</link>
		<dc:creator>Xenu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 May 2010 18:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=13011#comment-1271403</guid>
		<description>To Ann:&lt;br&gt;The problem with getting stuck in huge sites is related to the sitemap. Since version 1.3 (20.12.2008), Xenu has an abort box there. (Of course you can also disable the sitemap) Obviously, a 100000 URL site would have a huge sitemap.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;To Jaamit: &lt;br&gt;Contact me if you think you can reproduce this (send me a .XEN file that is shortly before it crashes)... Xenu should definitvely not crash the whole system, because it doesn&#039;t do any low level stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Ann:<br />The problem with getting stuck in huge sites is related to the sitemap. Since version 1.3 (20.12.2008), Xenu has an abort box there. (Of course you can also disable the sitemap) Obviously, a 100000 URL site would have a huge sitemap.</p>
<p>To Jaamit: <br />Contact me if you think you can reproduce this (send me a .XEN file that is shortly before it crashes)&#8230; Xenu should definitvely not crash the whole system, because it doesn&#39;t do any low level stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xenu</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/3-broken-link-checkers-reviewed-and-compared/13011/comment-page-1/#comment-1257428</link>
		<dc:creator>Xenu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 May 2010 13:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=13011#comment-1257428</guid>
		<description>To Ann:&lt;br&gt;The problem with getting stuck in huge sites is related to the sitemap. Since version 1.3 (20.12.2008), Xenu has an abort box there. (Of course you can also disable the sitemap) Obviously, a 100000 URL site would have a huge sitemap.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;To Jaamit: &lt;br&gt;Contact me if you think you can reproduce this (send me a .XEN file that is shortly before it crashes)... Xenu should definitvely not crash the whole system, because it doesn&#039;t do any low level stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Ann:<br />The problem with getting stuck in huge sites is related to the sitemap. Since version 1.3 (20.12.2008), Xenu has an abort box there. (Of course you can also disable the sitemap) Obviously, a 100000 URL site would have a huge sitemap.</p>
<p>To Jaamit: <br />Contact me if you think you can reproduce this (send me a .XEN file that is shortly before it crashes)&#8230; Xenu should definitvely not crash the whole system, because it doesn&#39;t do any low level stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BG Mahesh</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/3-broken-link-checkers-reviewed-and-compared/13011/comment-page-1/#comment-1110095</link>
		<dc:creator>BG Mahesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 06:34:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=13011#comment-1110095</guid>
		<description>Linkscan from Elsop.com too is a good one</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Linkscan from Elsop.com too is a good one</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Egan</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/3-broken-link-checkers-reviewed-and-compared/13011/comment-page-1/#comment-1110086</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Egan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 04:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=13011#comment-1110086</guid>
		<description>Yea, more than the main three should be reviewed here, as well as some actual review standards.  What do we, as optimizers, need from these sites?  Does the site provide this?  What does one do that that others should?  Etc?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yea, more than the main three should be reviewed here, as well as some actual review standards.  What do we, as optimizers, need from these sites?  Does the site provide this?  What does one do that that others should?  Etc?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sattarmalik</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/3-broken-link-checkers-reviewed-and-compared/13011/comment-page-1/#comment-1110064</link>
		<dc:creator>Sattarmalik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 16:35:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=13011#comment-1110064</guid>
		<description>Thanks Mike Wilton for providing link I will check it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Mike Wilton for providing link I will check it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Boyung</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/3-broken-link-checkers-reviewed-and-compared/13011/comment-page-1/#comment-1110063</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Boyung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 16:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=13011#comment-1110063</guid>
		<description>The SEO plugin for IIS 7 that was released to beta a few months ago searches for broken links for you among several other things.  You need to have IIS 7 obviously, but it works on any site, not just those hosted on your IIS server.  You just give it the URL and how many links to crawl, and it goes at it.  It isn&#039;t quick, but the report appears to work with any sized site and is free if you have IIS.  You can export the report to a CSV which you can then work with in Excel as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The SEO plugin for IIS 7 that was released to beta a few months ago searches for broken links for you among several other things.  You need to have IIS 7 obviously, but it works on any site, not just those hosted on your IIS server.  You just give it the URL and how many links to crawl, and it goes at it.  It isn&#8217;t quick, but the report appears to work with any sized site and is free if you have IIS.  You can export the report to a CSV which you can then work with in Excel as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Wilton</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/3-broken-link-checkers-reviewed-and-compared/13011/comment-page-1/#comment-1110059</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Wilton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 15:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=13011#comment-1110059</guid>
		<description>D&#039;oh! Completely forgot to leave a link: http://www.analogx.com/contents/download/Network/lnkexam/Freeware.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>D&#8217;oh! Completely forgot to leave a link: <a href="http://www.analogx.com/contents/download/Network/lnkexam/Freeware.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.analogx.com/contents/download/Network/lnkexam/Freeware.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Wilton</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/3-broken-link-checkers-reviewed-and-compared/13011/comment-page-1/#comment-1110058</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Wilton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 15:29:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=13011#comment-1110058</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve recently started using Link Examiner. It&#039;s a pretty solid little tool with some really cool features.  In the past I would use Xenu regularly or just use Google Webmaster Tools for crawl errors.

The nice thing about Link Examiner is that it shows  you error codes, gives you some SEO info (Is it missing titles, descriptions, etc.).  What I like most about it is that it lets you right click on a link and you have the options to open it in a browser, copy it to your clipboard, view a list of all pages that link to the page reporting an error, etc.  And if you need to provide the data to someone else, like a web designer or your boss, whoever it also has a nice little reporting feature which let&#039;s you export the list of links to text, CSV, and HTML files.

It&#039;s a nice little tool if you are looking for something that is free and reliable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve recently started using Link Examiner. It&#8217;s a pretty solid little tool with some really cool features.  In the past I would use Xenu regularly or just use Google Webmaster Tools for crawl errors.</p>
<p>The nice thing about Link Examiner is that it shows  you error codes, gives you some SEO info (Is it missing titles, descriptions, etc.).  What I like most about it is that it lets you right click on a link and you have the options to open it in a browser, copy it to your clipboard, view a list of all pages that link to the page reporting an error, etc.  And if you need to provide the data to someone else, like a web designer or your boss, whoever it also has a nice little reporting feature which let&#8217;s you export the list of links to text, CSV, and HTML files.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a nice little tool if you are looking for something that is free and reliable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/3-broken-link-checkers-reviewed-and-compared/13011/comment-page-1/#comment-1110030</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 09:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=13011#comment-1110030</guid>
		<description>Nice reviews. I use webmaster tools and xenu regularly to check for broken links. Xenu is also good for analyzing broken links of authority sites, for link building purposes, then send a friendly email to the authority site mentioning their broken link(s) and &#039;subtly&#039; suggest an alternative (i.e. my link) to use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice reviews. I use webmaster tools and xenu regularly to check for broken links. Xenu is also good for analyzing broken links of authority sites, for link building purposes, then send a friendly email to the authority site mentioning their broken link(s) and &#8216;subtly&#8217; suggest an alternative (i.e. my link) to use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/3-broken-link-checkers-reviewed-and-compared/13011/comment-page-1/#comment-1110019</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 08:17:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=13011#comment-1110019</guid>
		<description>Using google webmaster tools to check my links for me. So much better than anything on your list. Nice list anyhow though. Webmaster tools gives you all the 404 and all the pages linking to those 404 so you can fix them or contact them if they&#039;re external. Couldn&#039;t be easier.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Using google webmaster tools to check my links for me. So much better than anything on your list. Nice list anyhow though. Webmaster tools gives you all the 404 and all the pages linking to those 404 so you can fix them or contact them if they&#8217;re external. Couldn&#8217;t be easier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

